Voters (0)

Feb 05, 12 04:35 pm
  reply      new comment      top   

Is it OK to have an abortion at 7 months .. apparently to many it is.

Where do other candidates stand on this issue .. or do they give you the typical politician lie and never really answer the question .. and if they do they answer it dishonestly.

Ron Paul was a certified Doctor - who delivered thousands of babies .. I think he has an insight to this that many pundits .. talking heads especially on TV don't have.

Are bleeding hearts so upset at the honest rape part and totally ignore the 7 months part of the answer'?? Sure they are .. because to their ,man .. Obama it is OK to have an abortion at 7 months .. Baby's can survive and live at 7 months outside the womb .. and are left to die on the table .. is that OK? Let's get all the politicians to weigh in on that and see where they stand on that issue.

This is not a debate on whether a woman should be able to have an abortion but is it OK at 7 months? Ron Paul never said a woman shouldn't have the right to have an abortion - Does Romney or Sanitarium? Obama weighs in on 7 month abortion .. I would bet that no lib posted about this .. shoot I'm surprised that the anointed one even answered in such a wishy washy politician way.

Is honest rape what Wall Street and Clinton Obama and GW Bush have done to America the past 20 years??? They have and still are raping Americans daily in a financial sense. Ron Paul would try to correct that a whole lot more effectively than the current or past administrations.

With Ron Paul you won't have GS CEO's and VP's in the HW or Federal Reserve VP' making financial decisions for the 1% like you see in the current and past few administrations. That is something a president controls .. and it would appear to me is what Americans should be focusing on for this election .. jobs and the incredible debt this country has .. not what honest rape is and 7 month abortions. While those are good things to talk about ... there are other things that the candidates are not talking about but Ron Paul is.


 
Feb 13, 12 02:04 pm
  reply      new comment      top   

Reply to Big_T:

What kind of woman would terminate a pregnancy at 6 or 7 months?

Here is one answer; a woman who's unborn child is already dead. 20% or so of pregnancies end with the death of the child before birth, something that abortion fanatics fail to take into account. If your baby is dead, and you want to have it removed before you go into septic shock, then that counts as an abortion to these people.

Would you have the same fiery opposition to a 7 month pregnancy termination if you knew the baby was dead and had been for weeks at this point? Probably not, but this piece of information never seems to get a mention.

If someone I cared about was in this situation, I would tell them to brave the crazies and get that thing removed before it kills you too.

It never fails to amaze me the way these fanatics value the life of the unborn over the life of the woman carrying it. They take it to such an extreme that even when the child is already dead, they value it over the mother's life. I think that is sick and twisted, not any kind of morality that I recognize.

Ultimate Link Whore



Feb 06, 12 02:06 am
  reply      new comment      top   

First flip-flop i have seen from RP.. By bills he introduced life begins at conception, not 7 months.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanctity_of_Life_Act

Anyway, this a subject RP better avoid if he can.


 
Feb 06, 12 03:57 pm
  reply      new comment      top   

Reply to Resurected:

You're confused .. Ron Paul still believes life begins at conception ... he is saying that you can't wait until your 7 months pregnant to decide to have an abortion by claiming it was rape.

He is not saying women shouldn't have the right to choose.

He was asked the question and did not give a I puffed but did not inhale answer. Of course the paid for media pounced on that sound byte .. it got Gramps hook line and sinker and a couple of some of my other die hard liberals had to email my about this 'news worthy' event.

Meanwhile the past two weeks it comes out the US goes into debt another $1.2 Trillion dollars and corporations pay less tax than ever ... oh yes .. time for a change .. right. And the news from the ONLY candidate that would do something about the American Debt and make sure everyone paid there 'fair' share of taxes is in the news for what rape is.

If you want a flip flop man who really hides low on this issue go look at your candidate Obama see how he stands on this issue (there is a link above) ... or the other 'popular' candidate Romney. Typical wishy washy responses from the professional politicians Romney and Obama.


 
Feb 06, 12 06:45 pm
  reply      new comment      top   

Reply to Big_T:

On this one it looks more like Ron Paul is anti abortion, but does the states rights bit to be honest (and in states rights hes fighting just as much for states to outlaw abortion going against the fed as he is to make it legal)..

Over all though, he goes against half of what he says on the issue.. Lets go back to the first part, life at conception..Well, if life starts at conception it doesnt matter when the abortion takes place really.

Its a mud pit though on that one, hes better off sticking to rights people are more in favor of like marijuana laws.



Want to Post Comments?
Register for a free account or log in to an existing account.




Take a Tour

Popular Stories

Today's Top Users
1
17 points
2
0 points
3
0 points
4
0 points
5
0 points

News Tags