Reminiscent of their aggressive 2008 campaign efforts (including the website FightTheSmears.com), 1CObama for America 1D has launched a new site called AttackWatch.com. The goal of the website is to identify attacks on Obama 14 and quickly refute them in one searchable, centralized hub.
1CThe smears didn 19t end with the 2008 election, 1D the site advises. 1CPresident Obama 19s opponents are still using false claims against him and his record in an attempt to derail our momentum. Donate to support our campaign and help us fight back with the facts. 1D
1CWhen another unfounded attack surfaces, 1D the site promises, 1Cwe 19ll arm you with the truth so you can share the facts with your friends and family. 1D
Their motto is: 1CGet the facts. Fight the smears. 1D Supporters are also encouraged to report attacks.
In my estimation, the Obama team is probably wise to take the attacks made by GOP primary debaters seriously. As I noted months ago, George W. Bush 19s precipitous drop in popularity coincided almost precisely with the beginning of the Democratic primary debate season in 2003.
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2011/09/13/obama-for-america-launches-website-to-shoot-down-gop-attacks/#ixzz1Xwj11ZJb
So, you almost told the whole truth there.. Considering you should have come by the front page when finding this site. http://madville.com/out/news/334903_scary_stuff__report_an_attack_on_obama
You should have known what it was about before posting. Which makes me think either you wanted to mislead, or you just took what you saw from another site without really looking into it.
it's a laughingstock ... you going to write up your family member, friend, coworker because they have a different view and interpretation on politics than you do .. and then what are these 'people' at this site going to do ... have them audited by the IRS, records investigated, shadow them .. confront them .. have thier website torn down .. what???
When will the Dems have the teachers have kids reporting what their parents and family say about BO
Attack Watch commercial
It sounds mostly like a bot site, keywords..
That said, you have supported outright lies in the past, i dont see an issue with what is over all a wiki to tell people facts when the propagandists hit.
Also if you look, i dont see where it says to give names or report anything (what do you know, propaganda at work.. Seems we need this site for this very issue)... All you have to do is give you're email address and say what the disputed fact is, they email you the facts on the issue. Blame the tea party, birthers, swift boat veterans, ACORN BS., FOX News etc. You dont have an issue supporting the lies, but you have an issue with the facts being known? Thats a laughingstock to me.
I guess i can see why conservatives and their supporters would dislike facts.
I guess I can see why liberals and their supporters need their own news source to twist the truth ... I thought that was what media matters was for .. oh wait, Obama wanted full and complete control of the news.
No matter that a life long Washington news journalist Helen Thomas said that the Obama "control" of the press was worse than Nixon.
Excellent segway from Gramps referring to Nixon below. We all know what a scumbag Nixon was, so let's compare Obama to him, Helen Thomas did .. and Obama kept saying that he was no GW BUsh ... sure could have fooled me from all of Obama's policies that are the same or worse than GW's.
Did anybody ask Vince Foster what he thought about the Clinton's?
Can I find the 'truth' about why Obama attacked Libya without congressional approval???
What about Fast and Furious .. any real news there?
What about Solyndra
Care to talk about the subject at hand or not? (Keep in mind the only one twisting truth in this thread was yourself.)
Oh, and Helen Thomas also said this:
Nesenoff: Any comments on Israel? We're asking everybody today, any comments on Israel?
Thomas: Tell them to get the hell out of Palestine.
Nesenoff: Ooh. Any better comments on Israel?
Thomas: Hahaha. Remember, these people are occupied and it's their land. It's not German, it's not Poland...
Nesenoff: So where should they go, what should they do?
Thomas: They can go home.
Nesenoff: Where's the home?
Thomas: Poland, Germany...
Nesenoff: So you're saying the Jews go back to Poland and Germany?
Thomas: And America and everywhere else. Why push people out of there who have lived there for centuries? See?
Nesenoff: Are you familiar with the history of that region?
Thomas: Very much. I'm of Arab background.
Nesenoff: I see. Do you speak Arabic?
Thomas: Very little. We were too busy Americanizing our parents... All the best to you.[50]
Do you agree with Helen Thomas?
And still going on about Libya? That UN sanctioned war that France asked us all to go into. Still pretending thats Obama's work and still ignoring how it started? Still attempting to compare that to Bush's you are with us or against us terrorist supporter bit when Bush asked the world to help us in Afganistan and Iraq? Do you really not understand our obligations to the UN? Or you just making false issues again?
Care to go into Ron Paul, his investments in precious metals and mining companies and then talk about what he really wants with the gold standard, banishing the FED and who will profit from it and who will pay?
Vince Foster..There have been three official investigations into Foster's death, all of which concluded that he committed suicide.
The first was by the United States Park Police in 1993, in whose jurisdiction the original investigation fell. Due to Foster's position in the White House, the Federal Bureau of Investigation assisted in the investigation. Investigations by a coroner and Independent Counsel Robert B. Fiske, in a 58-page report released in 1994, also concluded that Foster had committed suicide. Conspiracy theories of a cover-up still persisted, some of which were promulgated by the Arkansas Project. After a three-year investigation, Whitewater independent counsel Kenneth Starr released a report in 1997 also concluding that the death was a suicide.
In addition, two investigations by the U.S. Congress found that Foster committed suicide
Thank god we dont live in you're America T.. Guilty until proven none-liberal?
Vince Foster ... do you know they never found the bullet that killed him ... kind of odd, I'd say ...read this little bit of info ... No really open-minded reader can walk away having read this document and think there is no cover-up - well a person with an open mind .. that would pretty much leave you out of the picture .. but go ahead and read the article .. or this one
If the glove does not fit . you must acquit ... the justice system is not perfect.
I really don't care what Helen Thomas's view of the middle east is .. but she was spot on about Obama controlling the press .. anyone with an open mind can see that .. please if you want to twist the truth around and change the subject .. feel free.
If you think Libya was about saving 'innocent' people .. you probably still believe in the easter bunny - it was about money / banks and oil .. and the president who 'taught' constitutional law knows that he has trampled the WAR POWERS Act .. since you like Wiki so much .. I figure you can read that. Tricky Dick and Obama ... good company.
You and the easter bunny .. go hand in paw I think too.
Big T, the Vince Foster "murder" is right up there with moon landing denial.
Good Golly, Miss Molly, how many forensic pathologists, hired independently by different organizations have to say "suicide" before you go with that determination rather than the one spouted by political propagandists?
And you talk about the Easter Bunny??? Next you are gonna tell me you still believe in the Yellowcake story, or that Saddam had large quantities of chemical and biological weapons that he was willing to share with his allies in al Qaeda. (Have to admit, THAT one was a doozie!)
The problem with you guys is that you are so gullible. All someone has to do is point out one little contrary detail (real or made up) such as the Park Service report said (whatever they said) or that the British Secret Service believes (such and such) and no amount of painstaking researched factual information to the contrary will shake your faith in the made up story line. 
Let me guess .. you didn't look at the link, because you know all the details. Like I said .. if the glove does not fit, you must acquit .. gee .. there was one contrary detail.
The problem with you guys is that you're so gullible .. you'll criticize GW for his yellowcake yet you sit on your hands when Obama says Libya war is about bombing the country into oblivion to save the mercenary rebels .. and even though the US is paying for 75% of it .. this is all about NATO. GW got congressional approval from the congress to invade Iraq. Shoot more American soldiers killed in Afghanistan under Obama than under GW .... what is up with that?
Hit squad to kill Osama - where was the trial - shoot the Nazis had trials at Nuremberg, Saddam had a trial? .. and Obama goes in and murders Osama - did not capture him alive and then they 'bury' him at sea because they don't want to spike the ball .. no pictures released, no one is allowed to talk about the operation, yet there is much fanfare and celebration and speech giving after this. Reports changed from a big firefight to .. One guy had a gun and resisted and Osama was unarmed
Doesn't this all sound out of character from the way that the US should be conducting business .. I mean besides Obama running for president said he'd shut down Gitmo .. but hasn't, much less all the other 'prisoners' that have been locked up in other places without a trial. There was plenty of criticism when GW and Cheney did this .. but now there is silence of the lambs that the same thing goes on under Obama and Biden .. what is the rational for that?
Back to the original thread, why would anyone representing the people in the white house want people to report links that are negative about him .. why .. to what end and purpose does this serve? and what makes this not scary to you .. and why do you think it is OK? I'm sure it would not sit right with you if a republican was in the white house and did the same thing .. it would me - but because of the political party that controls the WH right now .. to you, it is all right? Well .. it is likely that there will be a republican sitting in the WH next election and then, I'm sure you will change your tune.
T, when in a debate why do you always feel you need to insult others? Why do you always take the small minded approach? You seem to lack the ability to debate without it which really lowers you down to steamed, baron and the rest class in my eyes... You are quickly turning out to be not worth the time invested.
You know, they never found out who wrote those Ron Paul letters.. Must be true and he must have wrote them, if i use the logic you use.
Nixon has his enemies list, anyone who publicly doubted George W had their careers destroyed, this is nothing new except this is someone doing this on Obama's behalf, the president isn't having this done directly from the White House like the two examples above.
What would Obama do with an enemies list anyway? Go out of his way to be extra nice to them? What is the threat here?
What is the purpose of reporting links .. to what end is this all about? Unconventional ... and the fact it comes from people representing the president of the United States .. at least to me, carry's more weight than let's so a so called non profit organization like media matters.
It all depends on the intentions of the people at the top. Some presidents were determined to punish their perceived enemies as much as possible. Nixon had the IRS audit the tax returns of people who crossed him.
Look what the Bush White House did to Joe Wilson for saying he didn't think the yellowcake story was true.
As for Obama, he seems to treat his political opponents better than his friends, so where is the threat?
(Don't get me wrong it is a chickenshit thing to do no matter who is doing it, but you do have to consider the intent.)
As for Obama, he seems to treat his political opponents better than his friends, so where is the threat?
You sure about that?
Well, maybe not always.
He has been exceptionally gracious to people who say he is a foreigner and not legitimately the president, and so on. I was just going by that.
steamed
Check. I'll go there right now to report Mr. Big T as he is on the Internet, talking bad about Obama in the form of negatively talking about a website created by Obama for America for people to positively "turn in" people on the internet talking bad about Obama. sieg heil! der fuehrer BO! We control more than just the progressive media.