Yeah, article is bullshite.
I am waiting to hear actually details. I want specifics. What exactly was said and done? I haven't heard anyone say anything other than Cain yesterday and I am sure that's not the whole story.
Actually I don't want to hear more about these accusations. It is rare that it is possible to figure out what is true and what isn't on a "He Says/She Says" case.
Better to judge a candidate on more objective criteria.
I am reminded of the way Rush Limbaugh decides who is telling the truth and who is lying in these cases. The person who's politics Rush agrees with is always telling the truth and the one who's politics he disagrees with is the liar.
That just isn't objective enough for me, and since I don't use Rush's system, I just look to other kinds of information about a candidate.
Gramps
I am no fan of sexual harassment, but unless there is a solid way to distinguish absolute fact from possible fiction, I prefer to evaluate a politician on their political track record and on their political platform.
I know it sounds crazy to judge a candidate this way but I don't think we can afford to rule out someone who in the past has smoked a joint or has had sex from public office if they have some possible solutions to our many problems.
Vague or hard to confirm accusations of any variety just don't work for me.
EDIT; Just read the post and it is not a serious commentary on the issue. I think I got trolled again.