Voters (2)

Sep 10, 09 09:17 am
  reply      new comment      top   

Barack Obama is on track to have the most spectacularly failed presidency
since Woodrow Wilson.
But, Barack Obama is failing. Failing big. Failing fast. And failing
everywhere: foreign policy, domestic initiatives, and most importantly, in
forging connections with the American people. The incomparable Dorothy
Rabinowitz in the Wall Street Journal put her finger on it: He is failing
because he has no understanding of the American people, and may indeed loath
them. Fred Barnes of the Weekly Standard says he is failing because he has
lost control of his message, and is overexposed. Clarice Feldman of American
Thinker produced a dispositive commentary showing that Obama is failing
because fundamentally he is neither smart nor articulate; his intellectual
dishonesty is conspicuous by its audacity and lack of shame.


 
Sep 14, 09 07:11 pm
  reply      new comment      top   

Reply to hammers:

and the Horse he sells has beem stepped on so many times... oh yes he did...




Sep 12, 09 06:34 pm
  reply      new comment      top   

What an ass. (not talking about Obama here, ^)

My sex life in a nutshell? My sex life would actually fit in a nutshell. With lots o' room left over. ~S.L.



Sep 12, 09 07:03 pm
  reply      new comment      top   

Why does it always sound to me as if Obama's critics are describing George W Bush when they criticize Obama?

"Fundamentally he is neither smart nor articulate, his intellectual dishonesty is conspicuous by its audacity and lack of shame."

Call me crazy, but it sure sounds like Dubya to me.

Ultimate Link Whore

 
Sep 12, 09 07:05 pm
  reply      new comment      top   

Reply to Gramps:

Hmmm. Interesting point...

My sex life in a nutshell? My sex life would actually fit in a nutshell. With lots o' room left over. ~S.L.

 
Sep 12, 09 08:26 pm
  reply      new comment      top   

Reply to Gramps:

Meet the new boss ..same as the old boss


 
Sep 12, 09 08:30 pm
  reply      new comment      top   

Reply to Maude_Lynne:

We just had that 9/11 anniversary this past week. Remember right after the 9/11/01 attacks, when someone would ask Bush (or Rice, etc) what they were going to do about the attacks, he would always answer the question with something about Saddam Hussein?
Saddam has weapons of mass destruction. Saddam has allies in al Qaeda. Iraq is trying to buy yellowcake uranium from Niger, and so on. All of these were bald faced lies, and he never showed any shame from his dishonesty or the audacity of connecting 9/11 to Iraq, or for invading a foreign country for reasons that turned out to be wrong.
He ended up, much later, blaming it all on "intelligence failures" as if it were no big deal. Audacious, intellectually dishonest.

Ultimate Link Whore

 
Sep 13, 09 12:32 am
  reply      new comment      top   

Reply to Gramps:

What?! WTF?! OMFG?! Are you saying those Saddam/Uranium/What-have-you claims were LIES?!

Ooooh, the humanity!

My sex life in a nutshell? My sex life would actually fit in a nutshell. With lots o' room left over. ~S.L.

 
Sep 13, 09 01:23 am
  reply      new comment      top   

Reply to Gramps:

All of these were bald faced lies...

And, of course, you have proof that Bush knew those statements were incorrect at the time he made them?

You need only reflect that one of the best ways to get yourself a reputation as a dangerous citizen these days is to go about repeating the very phrases which our founding fathers used in the struggle for independence. - Charles Austin Beard

 
Sep 14, 09 07:07 pm
  reply      new comment      top   

Reply to jammer170:

And, of course, you have proof that Bush knew those statements were incorrect at the time he made them?

OMFG! Funniest thing I ever heard today. Thank you for making me cry with laughter.

My sex life in a nutshell? My sex life would actually fit in a nutshell. With lots o' room left over. ~S.L.



Sep 12, 09 07:40 pm
  reply      new comment      top   

The American Thinker is a well known politabloid rag. It is filled with writers who think Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh are "serious thinkers." The name of the rag itself seems to be a joke so subtle that one almost can't connect it with the hilarity that will inevitably ensue when one reads the articles.


 
Sep 13, 09 02:27 am
  reply      new comment      top   

Reply to TheNationalist:

Coming from a great mind like yours I must certainly change my opinion .. who are they compared to the mighty and infallible Nationalist


 
Sep 13, 09 03:13 am
  reply      new comment      top   

Reply to Big_T:

I'm certainly no match for the intellectual powerhouse that publishes such articles as "Why Obama Could not Stage a Coup" and "Virtue and Sarah Palin." ROTFL


 
Sep 13, 09 03:19 am
  reply      new comment      top   

Reply to TheNationalist:

It's good that a person knows his limitations


 
Sep 13, 09 03:24 am
  reply      new comment      top   

Reply to Big_T:

Frankly, my 100 word screeds on this site pass as better prose than any article on that site.


 
Sep 13, 09 05:02 am
  reply      new comment      top   

Reply to TheNationalist:

I'm sure you think so.


 
Sep 14, 09 07:14 pm
  reply      new comment      top   

Reply to TheNationalist:

Sears is a well known retailer... the american thinker aint shit.




Sep 13, 09 04:15 am
  reply      new comment      top   

I <3 these arguments discussions. You're all so sweet.

My sex life in a nutshell? My sex life would actually fit in a nutshell. With lots o' room left over. ~S.L.

 
Sep 13, 09 05:04 am
  reply      new comment      top   

Reply to Maude_Lynne:




Sep 13, 09 09:51 pm
  reply      new comment      top   

Mr. Big T and others should be careful in debating the Nationalist, it's actually Nancy Pelosi herself.

Give a man a fish and he will become a government dependent progressive voter. Teach a man to fish and he become a self sufficient and conservative Angel of Satan. Biden 3:24

 
Sep 13, 09 10:19 pm
  reply      new comment      top   

Reply to steamed:

This "Democratic Socialists of America" is really very offensive as well as inaccurate, not that it bothers you any to be that way.

The use of the word "socialist" is totally pejorative and not accurately descriptive at all.

Ultimate Link Whore


Want to Post Comments?
Register for a free account or log in to an existing account.




Take a Tour

Popular Stories

Today's Top Users
1
24 points
2
20 points
3
11 points
4
10 points
5
0 points

Funny Tags