So, you believe in suppression?
Wikipedia defines censorship
Unless its a locked topic... its a load a crap on Wiki
Censorship involves a government preventing speech. Wikipedia is a private organization, and when they lock an article is not censorship. It is an important fact to be aware of, but it is not censorship.
When the topic is locked no other idiots can change it... is the point I was making...
and load a crap look at the scientology crap that was on there because it wasnt locked.
When the topic is locked no other idiots can change it... is the point I was making...
The point I was making is that you implied it is censorship, which it is not. Censorship requires government involvement. Wikipedia is not affiliated with the government.
Besides which, your statement is also false, a locked topic can be edited by certain individuals. For instance, the Scientology article was locked to certain IP addresses owned by the Church of Scientology for putting false information on it (or unsubstantiated information). Everyone else can edit it. They temporarily locked Bush's, both Clinton's, and Obama's pages at various points during the elections for the same reason.
As far as the idea that Wikipedia is full of crap, then you must also believe things like the Encyclopedia Britannica are also full of crap, since scientific studies have shown it is just as accurate.
steamed
Gulliver's Travels has been rightly suppressed because of it's highly negative opinion of lawyers and their current highly appreciated donations to create a progressive society.