Sep 13, 06 05:47 pm — I have watched enough of the 5 years from 9/11 coverage to work up a head of steam. I am talking about real anger here.

First I am angry at that those lunatics who planned and executed the 9/11 attacks. It just about makes my blood boil to think that they probably shouted out that phrase that Islamic terrorists aways call out when they do something inhuman and barbaric; "God is great!" No one, no matter what their religious beliefs should be fooled for one minute into thinking that this atrocity would be pleasing to our Maker. You terrorists are not religious heros. You are mass murderers of totally innocent men, women, and children. You represent a threat to genuine faith as well as a threat to human civilization in general. You are purest hate in the service of evil. You suck!

Second, I am angry that our political leaders, of both parties but especially the Bush Administration have played the 9/11 tragedy the way Bill Murray's character in Ghostbusters played his job as an academic researcher at the beginning of the movie; as a dodge, a lark, an opportunity to pretend to do his job while going after personal goals. We were attacked by al Qaeda, but our leaders decided to go after Saddam's Iraq instead. The only connection between Saddam and the 9/11 attacks was the phony one that our government pretended existed so that they could get what they wanted from us. In five years they have plundered the national treasury, and good nature of the American people (many of whom are just now catching on to the con game), and the good will of the nations of the world.

It is still not clear why they have chosen to play us for a con instead of actually doing their jobs and living up to their responsibilities, but in the end it doesn't really matter. They suck and history will record their suckage for all time.

But the thing that really torques me off the worst is the symbiotic relationship that has now developed between Bush and al Qaeda. Every time an election cycle comes around, you can expect a rash of threating new videos from al Qaeda, which has the knee jerk reaction among Americans to put more unearned and unjustified faith in Bush. Bush, who often fails at the simpliest of tasks, never fails to exploit that faith, to bring in that fraidy cat vote, so he can just keep giving the terrorists everything that they could ever wish for. That has to stop with the November midterm election. We have to get rid of any of them that we can.

Five years after, and we are worse off that the day the attacks happened. There needs to be some serious accountability for that

PS Bush was at his best just after the attacks, and seemed to say all the right things. Has anyone actually made a list of all the things he said he would do? I would like to know if he ever made good on any of them. I can't think of one, but maybe I am just too angry to think straight about it. He promised a strong response to the attacks which hasn't happened to al Qaeda yet, a full investigation, which he worked to undermine, and to take care of the responders, the heros of 9/11, whom he has turned his back on. Did I miss anything? Oh yeah, he sucks!

Voters (0)

Sep 13, 06 06:21 pm
  reply      new comment      top   

I really think that it's sad that he uses the anniversary to go on an on about how we ned to stay on top of the terrorists. (Yes, we should) however, he shouldn't be using it for political gain and insinuating that America needs to keep Republicans in control.

However, what REALLY pisses me off are the idiots that take propaganda like "loose change" seriously. Has anyone watched this piece of crap? If anyone hasn't and wants to, I suggest they follow along with www.loosechangeguide.com.
It takes almost every claim that these idiots make and shows why they're false and outright lies.

On 9/11 one of my friends had her away message set as "Everyone should watch the video "Loose Change", especially on the anniversary of 9/11"
grr.. just ticks me off.. Another girl that I work with (though she doesn't work, but that's another rant) was quoting from that video in the company cafeteria.

"Because as far as Bush's God-spanked FCC is concerned, it is, always and forever, all about protecting the children. Or rather, it is all about protecting some imaginary Christian Everychild, some sort of perfect hypersheltered dovelike organism made of



Sep 13, 06 06:54 pm
  reply      new comment      top   

Major high-5 on the GW - Bill Murray connection. You pegged it on the head. What a bunch of lying, self serving assholes we have running this country. Both parties suck in a major way.

The most important right a nation can afford it's people is the right to be left alone.

 
Sep 14, 06 09:30 am
  reply      new comment      top   

Reply to Ddub:

the only choice is to vote third party


 
Sep 14, 06 10:23 am
  reply      new comment      top   

Reply to Big_T:

C onsidering there were 8 candidates from 8 parties running for Prez in 2000 and the democraps and repugnicans got 98% of the media coverage, the only chance America has would be to break their monopolies. But since they are in control of the rules, the chances of that happening are next to zero.

America, we're fucked.

The most important right a nation can afford it's people is the right to be left alone.



Sep 14, 06 09:40 am
  reply      new comment      top   

make that 5 years 3 days....

May you always have sand in your shoes and a dollar in your pocket. All you have to do is believe And the skeet will set you free --2 Live Crew,



Sep 14, 06 06:23 pm
  reply      new comment      top   

I agree with you, cmass, for the most part. I have no idea why we're in Iraq, though I'm fairly certain that the abutting countries of Iraq and the majority of Iraqi's are thrilled that we're there. Maybe the current administration felt that if democracy was ever going to flourish in the Middle East, Iraq was the best place the start; maybe Jr. wanted to storm Baghdad in response to the foiled assassination plot of dear-old-Dad; maybe they did it to test some of the Defense Department's new toys; maybe they did it just to piss you off.

I do know this: I have zero faith in politicians to accomplish what they say they're going to do. I don't necessarily blame them. I blame the bureaucratic behemoth our federal government has become.

Example 1: If Warren Buffett had been given $180B to fix New Orleans, it would have been completed 6 months ago under budget and better than ever.

Example 2: If MS13 had been given $300B to find Usama bin Laden, his head would've been atop a lance on the front lawn of the White House within a month or two.


 
Sep 14, 06 06:35 pm
  reply      new comment      top   

Reply to Abes:

Great examples and I think both would have been correct. You did miss the main reason we're over there though, Dick Cheney, Halliburton, GOP, oil and the web of snakes that are entwined.

The most important right a nation can afford it's people is the right to be left alone.

 
Sep 14, 06 07:15 pm
  reply      new comment      top   

Reply to Ddub:

See, I still have a problem with the "we are there for the oil" theory. I'm really not trying to score cheap political points with this, I am just trying to figure out what is actually going on.

There are two basic possibilities as to why we are in Iraq, and I can't get myself to believe in either one.

1) It is a part of some master plan, whose purpose has not been made entirely clear yet. As has been pointed out, invading Iraq after 9/11 makes as much sense as invading Peru after Pearl Harbor. But maybe it really does fit into some overall scheme, for good or evil, that we aren't aware of yet. The quest for oil is a plausible candidate for this plan, but events on the ground don't really support that concept. 3 years post invasion and oil production is below pre-war levels. That is no way to run a master plan.

2) The Bushies really believed that invading Iraq with a minimum force and no plans for occupation would magically transform Iraq into a beacon of freedom and democracy that would be a role model for all other countries in the region. Our troops really would be met as liberators and showered with candy and flowers. I just can't get myself to believe that hard headed, big brained pols like Cheney and Rumsfeld could actually believe in such nonsense.

It comes down to master plan vs massive incompetence, but I am not sure that the Bushies are up to the challenge of either one. Any better ideas?

Ultimate Link Whore

 
Sep 14, 06 07:47 pm
  reply      new comment      top   

Reply to Ddub:

Cheney: Maybe. He's a very smart (let the flame-war begin) and influential man, but I think you're giving him too much credit.

Halliburton: Negative. I've never figured out this part of the conspiracy theory. HAL's stock is under $30/share. And, yes, it's gone up since 2003, but so has everything else. It goes up after every war, because they're always called in to reconstruct. Don't believe me, check for yourself and see, the last big spike was just after the Balkan crisis when Clinton gave Halliburton a "no-bid" contract. It isn't just Bush/Cheney, my friend, they all do it.

GOP: Negative. Congress authorized the war. Both parties. Hindsight is 20/20.

Oil: You're kidding right?!? Have you filled up your car recently?


 
Sep 14, 06 09:29 pm
  reply      new comment      top   

Reply to Abes:

Dick Cheney is a smart and capable man. I think that is beyond question. The guy has a track record of competence that goes back to the 1970's. Same for Rummy. Like GHW Bush, their contemporary, they are CEO/technocrat caliber guys. That is what makes the Keystone Kops theory so hard to accept. How can guys this smart perform so poorly? It is a mystery.

One possibility is that Cheney and Rummy, among others, have been corrupted by their belief in the PNAC/neocon philosophy to the point where their blind faith in the "Unipolar Moment" has rendered them stupid.

This concept that the US is the sole superpower and therefore required to bitch slap the rest of the world, starting with Iraq, into submission to our will and our demand for resources, is just dumb enough to nullify the God-given brain power of the most capable pol.

Who the hell knows?

Ultimate Link Whore

 
Sep 15, 06 09:24 am
  reply      new comment      top   

Reply to Gramps:

those guys are there to make money, pure and simple. maybe the Neocon aggenda plays a role, but Haliburton's bottom line plays a MUCH bigger one.

Evil, a healthy alternative to goodness!



Sep 15, 06 05:38 am
  reply      new comment      top   

[ audio.visionary ] Defect borg: Refutile is sistance. Your ass will be simulated.

 
Sep 15, 06 06:59 am
  reply      new comment      top   

Reply to beast:

There ya go!

And that's final!


Want to Post Comments?
Register for a free account or log in to an existing account.




Take a Tour

Popular Stories

Today's Top Users
1
24 points
2
11 points
3
0 points
5
0 points